Capabilities

Every calculation this app performs, and what it refuses to do

Ten calculation modes, eighteen divisional charts, 82 event questions — and a published study of whether the timing engine works. Written so a practitioner can check every claim.

Sun to ~1″ · Moon to ~10″ · ΔT applied · 18 vargas · 3 dasha levels

In short. astrocult computes a full Parashari chart set, KP as a genuinely separate system, and a Vimshottari event scan across 82 classical questions. What it will not do is attach a date or a probability to a life event — because we tested that and published the result.

The difference from most Jyotish software is not the number of features. It is that every number here is either arithmetic you can verify against an ephemeris, or a classical rule shown with its reasoning attached. Nothing in between is presented as a forecast.

1 · What it computes

Ten independent calculation modes, each with its own reference frame rather than a shared one bent to fit:

2 · Precision, and how to check it

Positions are computed in-app rather than fetched, so the figures below are the ones that matter. Every one of them is verifiable against any standard ephemeris — that is the point of publishing them.

Quantity Method Agreement
SunTruncated VSOP87~1″
MoonMeeus lunar theory~10″
Time baseΔT correction applied
KP ayanamsaCalibrated to KSK 1900.0 epochwithin ~3′, 1900–2100
LagnaFrom city centroidsub-degree
D-60 sensitivityShifts with birth time~every 2 min

The KP row deserves the honesty it gets in the app itself: at roughly 3 arc-minutes of drift by 2025, that is about 6% of the narrowest sub-division. Star and sub lords are unaffected — but a cuspal sub lord sitting within 3′ of a boundary may differ from software built directly on Swiss Ephemeris. The app says so rather than hiding it.

3 · The Events section, in full

82 classical questions — marriage, first job, property, higher study, litigation, chronic illness, and so on. Each one is not a keyword but a rule set: a primary house, weighted supporting houses, obstructing houses, natural karakas, and the divisional chart the tradition assigns to it. Marriage, for instance, resolves to the 7th house, the 2nd and 11th as weighted support, the 6th and 12th as obstruction, Venus and Jupiter as karakas, and D-9 for refinement.

What a result actually shows

The part no other software offers

You can enter events that have already happened. The app then shows what these same rules say about them — which period was running, and whether its lords are significators for that event in your chart. It reports the tally plainly: if your real marriage falls in a period the rules never flag, you see that before you weigh anything still ahead.

It warns you about its own multiple comparisons. Before you compare against your life, the app tells you how many candidate periods it examined and how many it is showing. With enough candidates, some will fall near almost any date — so a match only means something if you decide what counts as a match before you look. It also asks you to check the other direction: highly-activated periods where nothing happened.

4 · Where this differs from other Jyotish software

Not on feature count — plenty of packages compute more vargas or more dasha systems. The differences that matter are about what the software is willing to claim.

The middle column describes patterns common in commercial Jyotish software, not any single named product.
QuestionCommonlyHere
Event timingA date range with a confidence percentageNamed periods with dasha boundary dates; no probability attached
Basis for the rankingAn undisclosed score out of 100A count of classical indicators that converge, defined on screen
Published validationNone111 charts, 866 dated events, result published including the null
Checking it against your lifeNot offeredBacktest panel, plus a multiple-comparisons warning before you look
KPOften Lahiri and whole-sign relabelledKrishnamurti ayanamsa with Placidus cusps, as KP requires
RectificationReturns one “correct” timeReturns Inconclusive when candidates score alike, and says why
When significators are absentLists periods anywaySays the classical significators are not present, and lists nothing

5 · What it deliberately will not do

These are design decisions, not missing features. Each one was in the product at some point and was removed on evidence.

6 · Reading it in Hindi or English

Every panel, label, note and caveat exists in both languages — not a machine translation layer over an English product, but written text in each, with Devanagari typography set properly rather than squeezed into a Latin line height.